What the Bible says and doesn’t say about homosexuality Free Essays

I waited to enter the debate again until my heart was In the right place and free of anger towards those who disagree with my viewpoint. Now I ask you prayerfully consider these words, not Just rejecting them in favor of your personal prejudices. Search the Scriptures, casting aside all previous viewpoints and open your heart to what the Spirit of God is speaking to you. We will write a custom essay sample on What the Bible says and doesn’t say about homosexuality or any similar topic only for you Order Now Many well meaning people build their case against homosexuality almost entirely on the Bible. They, Just as l, value the ancient text, and seek its guidance In their lives. Unfortunately, many of them have never really studied what the Bible does and isn’t say about homosexuality. I was unaware until about 2 years ago that a lot of what I’d been taught about the Bible by people who love God and want to teach others the words, was derived from an improper understanding of context, history, and also literalism, which was seen as heresy even going back to Origin and Popularly, early church fathers who were students of Apostle John. When I searched further, I came to see the Bible as more. I saw Its many cultures, religions and spiritualistic, but more importantly, I saw people who were trying with their limited understanding of the universe, nature, biology, and overall knowledge, to make sense of a world, and a God, they didn’t understand. The Bible has a powerful message for all regardless of gender, sexual orientation, personal philosophy or spiritual practice. But it’s a message of love and acceptance, not condemnation and, hate, and fear. Don’t take my word for It, though. I ask only that you’d consider what careful research. Prayer, and meditation has taught me about the passages used by some people to condemn God’s children simply because of a biological factor like attraction. Premise 1: The rampant epidemic of biblical illiteracy in this country A recent study quoted by DRP. Peter Gomes in The Good Book found that 38 percent of Americans polled were certain the Old Testament was written a few years after Jesus’ death. Ten percent believed Joan of Arc was Nosh’s wife. Many even thought the epistles were the wives of the apostles. A few key points Jesus says nothing about same-sex behavior. The Jewish prophets are silent about homosexuality. Only six or seven of the Bible’s one million verses refer to same-sex behavior in any way ? and none of these verses refer to homosexual orientation as It’s understood today. Premise 2: Historically, people’s misinterpretation of the Bible has left a trail of suffering, bloodshed, and death. Over the centuries, people, well meaning or otherwise, who misunderstood or misinterpreted the Bible have done terrible things. The Bible has been twisted to defend bloody crusades and tragic inquisitions; to support slavery, apartheid, and segregation; to persecute Jews and other non- Christian people of faith; to support Hitter’s Third Reich and the Holocaust; to oppose medical science; to condemn Interracial marriage; to execute women as witches; and Scripture for his purpose. Looking at recent history, within the past 60 years, countless LIGHT people, all of them children of God, were murdered, assaulted, abused, arrested, rejected, ostracizes, fired from Jobs, had their children taken away, and denied basic civil rights because of six or seven verses, most of them taken grossly out of context. Most of the people I know who say â€Å"the Bible condemns homosexuality’ would never condone these acts. Most Christians have no idea that the people killing gay and lesbia n persons go around quoting those few verses of Scripture as Justification. But it’s important to hear these stories, because I’m not writing this little pamphlet as a scholarly exercise. It’s a matter of life and death. I’m pleading on the side of love. Premise 3: We must be open to new truth from Scripture God is constantly speaking. What was once adamantly declared as truth in one age is now regarded with ignorance in another. SST. Peter was commanded to kill and eat animals he once regarded as unclean to show that the old covenant dietary laws had been lifted. SST. Paul, who once killed those who claimed the name of Jesus, in a matter of hours loved the God-Man whom he once despised as a false prophet. Even Jerry Falafel, a bastion of evangelical and fundamentalist Christianity, believed the Bible supported segregation in the church until a black shoeshine man asked him, â€Å"When will someone like me be allowed to become a member of your congregation? † I ask you to look again, with careful prayer, study, and meditation, this issue of sexual orientation. Don’t Just accept mindlessly the words of a pastor or priest, but as SST. Paul said in 1st Thessalonians, â€Å"†Test all things and hold fast to that which is good. † We must look at all verses within two frameworks Galatians 5:22-23 â€Å"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, Joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, gentleness, faithfulness, and self control. There is no law against such things. † Philippians 4:8 â€Å"Finally, beloved, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is Just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasing, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence and if there is anything worthy of praise, think upon these things. Even if we believe the Bible is â€Å"infallible† or â€Å"without error,† it’s dangerous to think that our understanding of every biblical text is also without error. We are human. We are fallible. And we can misunderstand and misinterpret these ancient words often with devastating results. Premise 4: The Bible is a book about God, not human sexuality The Bible is about God’s love for his children and all of his creation. It’s a story of God who is healing, renewing, empowering, and loving us, his sons and daughters, so we can follow God’s example with others. How to cite What the Bible says and doesn’t say about homosexuality, Papers

Nationality Ethnicity and Knowledge Trust †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Nationality Ethnicity and Knowledge Trust. Answer: Introduction: Individual placement in a society is of utmost importance to every human being on this earth. Their background, race, culture and human dynamics play a huge role in deciding how they would be placed within any society. Nationality is one among the many factors that decide this situation. Understanding the importance of nationality is thus very important (Mulkay 2014). The first step in placing an individual in any society is to examine and understand their cultural histories, ethnic heritages, values and beliefs, and finally their nationality. This is applicable to all, irrespective of their race, ethnicity, nationality or gender. Beyond that, the identification process must be extended to the cultural aspects of the nation from which the individual belong. In other words, it is important to understand, embrace and warrantee for reexamining and adjusting our worldviews for effectively practicing in a nationally competent manner. Nationality provides a base for understanding in which country a person belongs to and what are the possible national attachments and obligations that person might have. Nationality implies the place of birth of a person, simply making it the national identity of any individual. Nationality effectively provides people with a legal connection and personal allegiance to any particular place. Nationality is psychological in n ature and therefore acts as the source of patriotism and self-sacrifice (Kelly and Baker 2013). The psychological connections of nationality dictate the way a person conducts, which in turn plays a huge role in deciding how that person would be placed in a society. Nationality plays a huge role in deciding how an indivual would socialize. It decides peoples statuses in the society, involving race, religion, ethnicity, economic status,occupation, or class. Families provide the initial form of social placement. Such as, a person might be born into a white, Irish, Catholic family, where the mother is a politician and the father is a lawyer. This would affect how the person is viewed by other people in the society. This social placement and deciding aspects would have an impact on every facet of lives beliefs, values, preferences and so on. Some very common theories connected to social placement are conflict theory, where standardized testing promotes social inequality, and symbolic in teractionism, where interactions are explored and their impact is judged (Esteban, Mayoral and Ray 2012; Rock 2016). In terms of societal example, education that defines the types of jobs available for someone, can be a good one. Moreover, people from affluent nations have a better chance of acquiring better jobs and making more in the job field than people from poorer countries. The power of social class cannot be obscured by race or ethnicity. While all nations provide different capabilities to their citizens, there is a common ground that connects them all. It is extremely important that no human being gets denied or deprived from his or her nationality, as it is the right they are bestowed by birth. Nationality effectively provides people with a legal connection and personal allegiance to any particular place, acting as the source of patriotism and self-sacrifice. References Esteban, J., Mayoral, L. and Ray, D., 2012. Ethnicity and conflict: Theory and facts.science,336(6083), pp.858-865. Kelly, M. and Baker, C., 2013. Nationality, ethnicity and trust. InInterpreting the Peace(pp. 130-160). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Mulkay, M., 2014.Science and the Sociology of Knowledge (RLE Social Theory). Routledge. Rock, P., 2016.Making of symbolic interactionism. Springer.

Noam Chomskys Contribution to Linguistics Essay Example

Noam Chomskys Contribution to Linguistics Essay Noam Chomsky was born in Philadelphia in 1928. Noam Chomsky would have to be seen as one of the most significant and influential linguists of the twentieth century. Chomsky received his linguistic training under Leonard Bloomfield, whose behaviorist empiricism dominated American linguistics during the 1930s and 1940s, and from Zellig Harris, whose political stances during the 1950s pleased Chomsky more than his version of linguistic structuralism. In contrast to Saussure and Firth, many linguists writing in the later part of the twentieth century have been avowedly mentalist or cognitivist. The most famous of these is Noam Chomsky. As with Saussure and Firth, it will be impossible to do full justice to an influential and widely discussed scholar. (A brief but useful evaluation of the earlier years of Chomskys contribution to linguistics, psychology and philosophy can be found in Lyons 1970; and Chomskys more recent views can be found in Chomsky 2000). Even at the early stage, Chomsky was producing highly original work, which diverged fundamentally Harriss. In his B.A. thesis he was doing things that were, in his own words, radically at odds with everything in structural linguistics†¦ which is why [it and Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory] were published only 30 years later. The thesis was as different from structural linguistics as anything could be, which was why Harris never looked at it and no one in the field reacted to it. In fact, Morphophonemics of Modern Hebrew remains the only text in existence, that seeks to apply and evaluation measure in anything remotely like the detail. We will write a custom essay sample on Noam Chomskys Contribution to Linguistics specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Noam Chomskys Contribution to Linguistics specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Noam Chomskys Contribution to Linguistics specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Noam Chomskys contribution to Linguistics The programme of cognitive linguistics initiated by Chomsky and his colleagues in the 1950s and 1960s proposed a distinction between deep and surface structure in language. At least in the early stages of this programme, deep structure was assumed to have a mental reality closely related to meaning: It is the deep structure underlying the actual utterance, a structure that is purely mental, that conveys the semantic content of the sentence. It was also suggested that this deep structure might be universal: The deep structure that expresses the meaning is common to all languages, so it is claimed, being a simple reflection of the forms of thought (Chomsky 1966, p.35). Those who followed Descartes characteristically assumed that mental processes are common to all normal humans and that languages may therefore differ in the manner of expression but not in the thoughts expressed (Chomsky 1966, p.6). This universalism is itself tied to mentalism: The discovery of universal principles wo uld provide a partial explanation for the facts of particular languages, in so far as these could be shown to be simply specific instances of the general features of language structure†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ Beyond this, the universal features themselves might be explained on the basis of general assumptions about human mental processes or the contingencies of the language use†¦..'(Chomsky 1966, p.54). Chomskys contribution to linguistics, and thence to modern thought, has been broadly threefold. In the first place, he moved the emphasis of linguistics form the strictly descriptive and inductive level (the level of the endless cataloguing of utterances from which conclusions about grammar could then be drawn) to the ideal level of competence and deep stricture, the level which opens up a creative aspect in language. In short, Chomsky showed, within his technical expertise in linguistics, that language was more than its material execution. Second, he brought about a reconsideration of language learning by arguing that language competence is not acquired inductively through a behaviorist stimulus-response conditioning, but is the consequence of an innate cognitive capacity possessed by human. In other words, linguistic freedom and creativity is not acquired, but always already exists as a governing a priori. Third, the distinction between competence and performance—even when i t was poorly understood—has served as a metaphor for structural studies in other disciplines such as philosophy and sociology (cf., Habermass notion of communicative competence, and Bourdieus notion of habitus – notions which echo Chomskys conception of agency). Noam Chomskys, Remarks on Nominalization (1970), Influence on the development of generative word-formation appeared to be crucial. In Mohanans view, with this seminal paper the traditional notion of word was reintroduced into generative linguistics. Chomsky captured certain lexical regularities in terms of lexical rules; these rules differ in their nature from the transformational rules of sentence generation. Lexical rules are, in Chomskys view, redundancy rules, that is to say, the rules which capture regularities in the lexical entries. Chomsky distinguishes two possible ways of treating derived nominal (and the issues of deriving new word in general); one either extends base rules to accommodate the derived nominals directly (all complex words will be listed in the lexicon), thus simplifying the transformational component—the lexicalist position; or, it is the base structures which may be simplified, and the derivation of nominalizations (and, by implication, all other complex words) would be the matter of transformational rules (without listing any complex word in the lexicon)—the transformational position. In 1965 Chomsky dropped the kernel sentence notion in a major reworking of his model, which introduced a revolutionary new concept to the theory of syntax: a distinction between underlying (deep) structure and surface structure, the two inter-related by transformations, allowing active and passive sentences, for example, to have the same deep structure but two different transformational histories producing two different surface structures, published as Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, this became known as the standard theory. In practice, however, the model soon showed itself to be cumbersome and insufficiently sensitive to the needs of languages other than English. Chomsky and his colleagues made substantial revisions during the 1970s to create the extended standard theory. The old phrase-structure rules were largely replaced by a more flexible syntactic process known as X-bar theory. The deep/surface distinction was preserved along with transformations, but in a heavily modified fo rm, and there were also new features, all tending towards greater simplicity. The revised model (called Government and Binding (GB), later Principles and Parameters (PP)) appeared in 1981 and gave the whole generativist enterprise a new lease of life. Since then there have been further simplifying changes resulting in The Minimalist Program of the 1990s. Syntactic Structures Chomskys first book Syntactic Structures (1957) gave its name to the first wave of thinking, which was chiefly concerned with grammatical description. Its contribution was to show that mentalistic grammar could be made scientific by the use of explicit and rigorous forms of statement, known as Generative Grammar. Hierarchical phrase structure was described through rewrite rules of the S—NP VP type that expand one element into others, yielding eventually kernel sentences of the language. But such rules were incapable of describing the whole of human language and needed to be amplified by transformations that could modify the structure of the kernel sentence into passives, questions, etc. A key example sentence as Colorless green ideas sleep furiously, held to show the difference between grammaticality and meaningfulness. Conclusion Chomskys work has always been motivated by a single goal: to explain human language acquisition. Many of the changes mentioned above were expressly designed to help account for the acquisition process by offering simpler procedures in tune with in the innate capacities of the acquirer.   The reintroduction of innate ideas has been Chomskys most far-reaching and controversial Proposition. For a recent statement of the role semantics in linguistics, see Noam Chomsky, Topics in the theory of Generative Grammar. In this article, Chomsky (1) emphasizes the central importance of semantics in linguistic theory, (2) argues for the superiority of transformational grammars   over phrase-structure grammars largely on the grounds that, although phrase-structure grammars   may be adequate to define sentencehood for (at least) some natural languages, they are inadequate as a foundation for semantics, and (3) comments repeatedly on the rather primitive state of the concepts of semantics and remarks that the notion of semantic interpretation still resists any deep analysis. nbsp;

261 Intro to Am Literature since 1945 Professor Ramos Blog

261 Intro to Am Literature since 1945 Intro to American Literature since 1945 Intro to American Literature since 1945 1069 – 1086 Intro New Readers, New Writers, New Heroes Literature and American Media Experiment and Play in Twentieth- and Twenty-First-Century Literature Literature Now Modernism vs Postmodernism Modernism Postmodernism Difference between Modernism and Postmodernism

Painting, architecture and sculpture of British designers Essay

Painting, architecture and sculpture of British designers - Essay Example A huge spectrum of the art in the 17th century was introduced in Britain from Italy which relied heavily on the physical impression the art depicted. Annibale Carracci and Caravaggio are some of the first Italian painters who ushered the baroque style into Italy. They ensured that naturalism and classicism coexisted to bring the required impression through art and architecture. Churches were painted and decorated in the first baroque style at the time. The spiral staircases can be witnessed in a number of present day buildings in the UK; this was one of the first architect’s works of the baroque period. In Britain art began with stone carving and engraving by the Celtic tribes. Some of the artefacts in the national museum illustrate the beautiful shapes on swords and household goods, this continued until it was conquered by the Romans. The Roman regime introduced the patterned and mosaic approaches in constructions of some of the buildings in the UK. This period is closely fol lowed by the influence of religion which brings into perspective the concepts of illuminating manuscripts. In 1066 after the invasion by William of Normandy the buildings in London were characterised by rounded columns and semi-circular arches which a system is referred to as the Romanesque. Medieval and Gothic architectural styles were later ingrained in Britain’s art system. It is a specific class affair as depicted by the type of people who practiced the concepts, for instance William Morris was a trained architect.

Article 2 (Economics) Why Knockoffs Can Help a Strong Brand

2 (Economics) Why Knockoffs Can Help a Strong Brand - Article Example o the article has been provided by Renee Gosline’s study in Massachusetts Institute of Technology and also by Yi Qian of the National Bureau of Economic Research. According to the research findings of the two above mentioned researchers, counterfeits serve as a passage to the original products and have positive effects on the sales of the original brand products. The counterfeits brands therefore according to the article can be said to have more advertising effect than substitution effects and therefore pose no much danger to the original brands. They actually save them from more advertisement charges since sooner or later the consumers realize the difference between the original and the counterfeit and move to the original. This knockoff effect does not however affect only the formal brands which have trademarks and are protected by law. The article further explains that even individual creators with their own unique line of designs and creativity can have copies of their work being reproduced. The overall effect and outcome is however the same as that of the formal brands since the consumers will realize the difference of the original and the counterfeit and move to the original. Raustiala, Karl and Springman, Chris. â€Å"Why Knockoffs Can Help Build a Strong Brand.† Freakonomics 9/5/2012. Retrieved from:

The Duties And Responsibilities Of Own Role Example

The Duties And Responsibilities Of Own Role Example 1.1 Describe the duties and responsibilities of own role My duties as a care worker involve giving clients personal care, such as assisting with washing, dressing, toileting requirements including catheter and convene care. Assisting with nutritional requirements such as meal planning/preparation/feeding, prompting/administering medication, shipping, cleaning. It is my responsibility to ensure that the client maintains an acceptable level of health and to promote the clients well-being. It is also my responsibility to ensure that all company policies and procedures are carried out and to maintain records for the service delivered, along with responsibility for ensuring that my training needs are kept up-to-date so that I am at the level of standards required to undertake my role. Finally, it is my duty and responsibility to treat clients with respect and dignity at all times. Question: Identify standards that influence the way the role is carried out The standards I have identified that influence the way I carry out my role as a carer working in domiciliary care are: Care Standards Act 2000 Domiciliary Care Regulations 2002 Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 Codes of Practice National Occupation Standards Care Quality Commission Standards These make up the standards to follow for good working practice within Health and Social Care. Question: Describe ways to ensure that personal attitudes or beliefs do not obstruct the quality of work To ensure that personal attitudes or beliefs do not obstruct the quality of work carried out a carer should dedicate themselves to excellence, develop good work ethics and be professional at all times. It may also be possible to change personal attitudes through further training. 2. Be able to reflect on own work activities Explain why reflecting on work activities is an important way to develop knowledge, skills and practice Reflecting on work activities can help a care worker gain a better/clearer understanding of social, cultural, personal and historical experiences. Reflecting is learning through experience, so by deliberating in an orderly fashion we can learn from our own (or others) mistakes, and conversely from what we (or others) have done well and use this new knowledge to help us in future situations. Therefore, reflection can help us to find an awareness of our thoughts and feelings which may relate to a particular area of our working practice. Thus enabling a link between theory and practice, so allow integrated learning. Assess how well own knowledge, skills and understanding meet standards Since starting work in the care industry I have undertaken a considerable amount of formal training, along with practical on the job training/learning. I now have knowledge and understanding of many health and social care policies and procedures and undertake my role in a professional yet empathetic manner. I respect each clients diversity and equality, ensure a high level of confidentiality and promote their independence and well-being by maintaining a high level of personal respect. Demonstrate the ability to reflect on work activities The ability to reflect means to look back on something and think about it in a logical manner. So in a work capacity reflecting on what went well, what didnt go so well, what could be changed and why this change would be necessary all helps regarding possible outcomes of future client calls. For example, in my own work practice when I am on a client call I try to fit my personality to the individual client and work in a way that will enable them to interact well with me. However, sometimes the communication isnt as effective as I would hope for it to be upon working with a new client, I therefore tend to go away and reflect on how I can change my communication strategies with that particular client and approach the situation from a different angle on the next visit to help ensure that the call runs more smoothly on this occasion. 3. Be able to agree a personal development plan Identify sources of support for own learning and development The first point of support regarding own learning and development should be your line manager. Between the two of you you can discuss and agree further training possibilities and a personal development plan which may include accessing company and possibly external training. Discuss options with colleagues/team members/other professionals. Finding a mentor to work alongside of, and gain further support/skills and knowledge from. Describe the process for agreeing a personal development plan and who should be involved The personal development plan should be created by the individual and should include statements and an action plan that works towards achieving personal goals within their career role – this could include areas such as education, training, career, self-improvement. This plan should then be discussed with the line manager to check whether the goals are in line with the organizations expectation of the individual and then regular meetings should be arranged to ensure that the personal development plan stays on an achievable track. Contribute to drawing up own personal development plan A personal development plan is unique to each individual and tailored to suit the individuals personality and goal aspirations. When developing my own personal development plan I would do the following: Determine the strongest aspects of my personality traits. Determine my goals Create a mission statement to help me focus on my plan Create the plan, which will include how my goals will be accomplished – by breaking them down into smaller tasks and into timescales Keep a planner/schedule to track my progress Re-assess and update my personal development plan at regular internals as necessary. In line with regular management appraisals. 4. Be able to develop own knowledge, skills and understanding Show how a learning activity has improved own knowledge, skills and understanding I attended a one day dementia awareness course within my organization, which gave me a much greater understanding of the functioning of the brain and the areas of the brain involved in different kinds of dementia. This gave me a much greater understanding of why clients with dementia behave in the manner that they do and why they react as they do, which ultimately has enabled me to be pro-active in my actions and reactions to clients with dementia. Show how reflecting on a situation has improved own knowledge, skills and understanding Actively reflecting on a particular situation enables me to evaluate the pros and cons of a situation that has already happened. By taking into account other peoples perspectives and viewing from all sides in an objective way I gain further knowledge and understanding, which enables me to subtley alter my own manner for a beneficial outcome to both myself and the client. Show how feedback from others has developed own knowledge, skills and understanding Receiving feedback from managers, colleagues and clients helps me to gain a better understanding of my strengths and weaknesses in my job role. It then enables me to reflect on the comments and act on them accordingly. So, for example, if a colleague should feedback that I do not work well as part of a team I could integrate this comment and work on my team building skills. If my line manager should feedback that a client has commented on my high quality of care I will also use this as a positive marker of my abilities as a care worker. Thus, with either positive or negative feedback it gives me an understanding of others perspectives of my work and I have therefore gained the knowledge that will facilitate me with honing my skills accordingly.